<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss" version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>NewsCloud.com 933 News</title>
<description><![CDATA[Top stories and videos from NewsCloud 933]]></description>
<link>http://www.newscloud.com/section/933</link>
<lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 01:40:36 +0100</lastBuildDate>
<generator>FeedCreator 1.7.2</generator>
<atom:link xmlns:atom="http://purl.org/atom/ns#" title="NewsCloud.com 933 News" rel="self" href="http://www.newscloud.com/rss/section/933/" type="application/rss+xml"/><language>en-us</language>
<item>
<title>Idealog: Is the Yes on 933 campaign illegally fundraising for Initiative 933?</title>
<link>http://www.newscloud.com/read/Idealog_Is_the_Yes_on_933_campaign_illegally_fundraising_for_Initiative_933</link>
<description><![CDATA[And finally, the yeson933.com domain name is registered to Property Fairness Coalition. So, why is the Property Fairness Coalition, the group properly registered with the PDC, raising money under the name Citizen Taxpayers' Association - an apparently unregistered group? and why does this unregistered entity have the same contact / mailing address as the Citizens' Alliance for Property Rights a third group?

This just leads me to ask why? And who is behind this? And what is the agenda of the yes on 933 team?]]></description>
</item>
<item>
<title>Idealog: Yes on 933 is Lying to Rural Property Rights Activists about Eminent Domain</title>
<link>http://www.newscloud.com/read/Idealog_Yes_on_933_is_Lying_to_Rural_Property_Rights_Activists_about_Eminent_Domain</link>
<description><![CDATA[So, the Yes on 933 folks have put together a slick flash animation focusing on how 933 would stop Washington State from invoking Eminent Domain. The problem is it's a gigantic lie. Initiative 933 mentions Eminent Domain only twice in its preamble. None of the acts' operating provisions - the sections that make law - mention eminent domain at all.

I'm concerned that the Yes on 933 folks are taking advantage of rural property owners - tapping their resentment at politicians to get them to vote for this initiative. Instead - rural voters are just getting used to push through an initiative that will be a free for all for developers and lawyers.]]></description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
