Constitution

Sort by

    • Protect yourself, your family and America

      Posted by themelinda

      When your drug-sodden brother starts taking out loans and expects you to pay your remedy is to run a notice in the paper under LEGAL NOTICES. We have all seen them.

      The time has come for all of us to do just that. Do it today. Protect yourself and let Congress, and the world, know we are not going to stand for it. Get on record.

      Post a comment

    • thumbnail

      Voters in Ecuador Approve Constitution and Rights of Nature

      Posted by Jeff from Washington Post

      In a country rich with ecological treasures, including the Galapagos Islands and part of the Amazon rain forest, the constitution also calls on government to avoid measures that would destroy ecosystems or drive species to extinction -- the first such measure of its kind, according to Ecuadoran officials. The constitution would allow civil unions for gay couples.

      Read comments (1)

    • Review of Discovery Institute's Evolution Textbook

      Posted by Jeff

      Intelligent Design is still a hot topic, as evidenced by recent legislation mandating that it be taught in school. Pro-ID group Discovery Institute has released an evolution textbook for use in schools, but a review shows it to be chock full of bad science and questionable reasoning. 'The book doesn't only promote stupidity, it demands it. In every way except its use of the actual term, this is a creationist book, but its authors are expecting that legislators and the courts will be too stupid to notice that, or to remember that the Supreme Court has declared teaching creationism an unconstitutional imposition of religion.'

      Post a comment

    • thumbnail

      Ecuador Constitutional Assembly Votes to Approve Rights of Nature In New Constitution

      Posted by Jeff from Idealog.US

      On July 7, 2008, the Ecuador Constitutional Assembly - composed of one hundred and thirty (130) delegates elected countrywide to rewrite the country's Constitution - voted to approve articles for the new constitution recognizing rights for nature and ecosystems. "If adopted in the final constitution by the people, Ecuador would become the first country in the world to codify a new system of environmental protection based on rights," stated Thomas Linzey, Executive Director of the Community Environmental Legal Defense Fund.

      Read comments (6)

    • Melt Down the FED and do it NOW.

      Posted by themelinda

      You can give Americans an alternative to the FED that will be adopted across the world like wild fire. it costs ten million dollars but you will never again pay interest of be charged fees. Fractional Reserve Banking will be a thing of the past. You get what you pay for.

      Post a comment

« Previous12345...67Next »


What is

NewsCloud?

» The most important stories from around the Web all in one place

» Gathered and ranked by a community of passionate readers surfing the Web 24 hours a day

» Ready to share: email stories, post news to your blog and keep up with your friends

Learn more



  • Just Said
  • Top Posters
  •  
  1. thumbnail

    Jeff comments on:

    Voters in Ecuador Approve Constitution and Rights of Nature

    Read more here:

    "Ecuador is now the first country in the world to codify a new system of environmental protection based on rights," stated Thomas Linzey, Executive Director of the Community Environmental Legal Defense Fund.

    "With this vote, the people of Ecuador are leading the way for countries around the world to fundamentally change how we protect nature," added Mari Margil, Associate Director of the Legal Defense Fund.

    Article 1 of the new "Rights for Nature" chapter of the Ecuador constitution reads:  "Nature or Pachamama, where life is reproduced and exists, has the right to exist, persist, maintain and regenerate its vital cycles, structure, functions and its processes in evolution.  Every person, people, community or nationality, will be able to demand the recognitions of rights for nature before the public bodies."
     

    Reply »

    9:53 am 9/29/08
  2. thumbnail

    j1o2n3a4s5 comments on:

    Ecuador Constitutional Assembly Votes to Approve Rights of Nature In New Constitution

    our abuse of the animal world since the domestication revolution in 8000 bc diserves some rerperations.

    the slavery and death camp comparisions…

    Reply »

    2:56 am 7/14/08
  3. thumbnail

    seimaden4 comments on:

    Ecuador Constitutional Assembly Votes to Approve Rights of Nature In New Constitution

    that’s cool, humans taking responsibilities for their actions. our actions affect ecosystems which in turn affects us. I don’t think the U.S. will ever do that. The U.S. thinks they own the world and everyone in it from animals to "foreigners". The U.S. says "The world’s my oyster. you are my *****es." BWAHAHAHAHA!

    Reply »

    8:25 am 7/09/08
  4. thumbnail

    mozellagi2000 comments on:

    Ecuador Constitutional Assembly Votes to Approve Rights of Nature In New Constitution

    Preposterous.  Granting rights without expecting responsibilities is nothing short of insanity. Gorilla’s, trees and lakes have no obligation to us, therefore we have no obligation to grant rights to them.  As for Ron Sims attempting to steal land from King Country residents, finally a small glimmer of sanity has finally taken root in the Washington State court system. 

    Reply »

    6:15 am 7/09/08
  5. thumbnail

    Jeff comments on:

    Ecuador Constitutional Assembly Votes to Approve Rights of Nature In New Constitution

    Leif, I mentioned that exact story today to Mari Margil today in Portland.

    Reply »

    12:41 am 7/09/08
  6. thumbnail

    leif comments on:

    Ecuador Constitutional Assembly Votes to Approve Rights of Nature In New Constitution

    This is so great. It sets an immensely important precedent.


    Here’s an interesting local angle in today’s Seattle Times: The same day Ecuador enshrined nature’s inherent right to exist in its constitution, an appeals court in Washington State struck down part of King County’s 2004 "critical-areas ordinance," calling it "an indirect but illegal ‘tax, fee, or charge’ on development." The ordinance limits landowners to clearing no more than half of the vegetation—read: forest—on parcels larger than 1.25 acres or 35% of lots larger than 5 acres. Property-rights activists gleefully revved their chainsaws, while enviros and county officials wrung their hands.


    Quite a contrast, no? Can we get Tom Linzey back here to talk to the WA legislature?

    Reply »

    10:11 pm 7/08/08
  7. thumbnail

    Jeff comments on:

    Ecuador Constitutional Assembly Votes to Approve Rights of Nature In New Constitution

    Reply »

    3:45 pm 7/08/08
  • Just Said
  • Top Posters
  •  
  1. thumbnail

    Jeff

    Member since Oct 2008

    Jeff is the founder of NewsCloud. He is also a freelance writer and blogs at Idealog.

    Seattle


  2. thumbnail

    dureau

    Member since Oct 2008

    from Stand ShOut

    Dallas


  3. thumbnail

    themelinda

    Member since Oct 2008

    No city