Copyright

Sort by

    • In Defense Of Patents and Copyright

      Posted by Jeff from Yro.slashdot

      C|Net Editor Michael Kanellos offers a potentially contentious opinion piece about patents and copyright on the CNet site. Highlights of the fairly biased piece include: a cheap shot dismissing open source projects as existing only to act as a foil for Microsoft, blatantly equating copyright infringement with stealing, and an embarrassing failure to even casually mention the current term lengths of patents and copyrights as a driving factor behind popular dissatisfaction.

      Post a comment

    • You Can't Oppose Copyright and Support Open Source

      Posted by Jeff from Yro.slashdot

      Reader gbulmash sends us to his essay on the fallacy of those who would abolish copyright. The argument is that without copyright granting an author the right to set licensing terms for his/her work, the GPL could not be enforced. The essay concludes that if you support the GPL or any open source license (other than public domain), your fight should be not about how to abolish copyright, but how to reform copyright.

      Post a comment

    • thumbnail

      EFF sues Viacom over YouTube takedown of Colbert parody

      Posted by Jeff from BoingBoing

      Oh Viacom, you should read those DMCA lists of clips before you order them taken down: The video, called "Stop the Falsiness," was created by MoveOn and Brave New Films as a tongue-in-cheek commentary on Colbert's portrayal of the right-wing media and parodying MoveOn's own reputation for earnest political activism.

      Post a comment

    • iFilm Infringement Could Blunt Viacom's YouTube Argument

      Posted by Jeff from Chineseinvancouver.blogspot

      "Infringing videos on iFilm could undermine Viacom's case against YouTube. Although it's arguably not a nest of infringement like YouTube, iFilm appears to host more than a handful of videos for which its corporate parent Viacom does not own the copyright. More importantly, Viacom isn't engaging in the kind of proactive infringement identification practices it expects of YouTube, which may cause problems for them in court.

      Post a comment

    • thumbnail

      A Fee Per Song Can Ruin Us, Internet Radio Companies Say

      Posted by Jeff from New York Times

      Under the ruling released on March 2, Web broadcasters must pay each time a listener hears a song, at a rate that began at 0.08 cent in 2006 (the ruling applies retroactively) and rises to 0.19 cent in 2010. Besides increasing the charge for each song, the ruling established a $500 minimum payment for each Web channel — making it difficult for companies like RealNetworks and Pandora to offer as many different kinds of music as they do now.

      Post a comment

    • thumbnail

      Lessig: Make Way for Copyright Chaos

      Posted by Jeff from New York Times

      But 20 months ago, the Supreme Court reversed this wise policy of deference. Drawing upon common law-like power, the court expanded the Copyright Act in the Grokster case to cover a form of liability it had never before recognized in the context of copyright — the wrong of providing technology that induces copyright infringement. It announced this new form of liability even though at precisely the same time Congress was holding hearings about whether to amend the Copyright Act ...

      1 comment

« Previous123Next »


What is

NewsCloud?

» The most important stories from around the Web all in one place

» Gathered and ranked by a community of passionate readers surfing the Web 24 hours a day

» Ready to share: email stories, post news to your blog and keep up with your friends

Learn more



  • Just Said
  • Top Posters
  •  
  1. thumbnail

    aaronbarlow72 comments on:

    YouTube Takes Down Comedy Central Clips Based on DMCA Claims

    Ironic considering Matt Sone and Trey Parker are such civil Libertarians. Then again they had no control over whether CC showed the image of mohammed on Cartoon wars.

    This is what happens when greedy corporate paper pushers have control over creatives.

    Reply »

    6:14 am 5/08/08
  2. thumbnail

    sgtwildey comments on:

    YouTube Takes Down Comedy Central Clips Based on DMCA Claims

    Comedy Central. There’s a laugh. NLOL. Here’s a group that says ‘Ok’ to endless showings of the exact same movies (Orange County, Blue Collar Tour, Office Space, Saving Silverman, etc.) then has the audacity to pull a stunt like this youtube business. You should have enough material to steal first, then shoot the ‘sue you’ gun. In my eyes this is like the BBC trying to sue Bill Gates for using too much electricity.

    Reply »

    2:33 pm 1/28/08
  3. thumbnail

    rwtaylor comments on:

    YouTube Takes Down Comedy Central Clips Based on DMCA Claims

    yup

    Reply »

    5:23 pm 9/30/07
  4. thumbnail

    Jon comments on:

    Lessig: Make Way for Copyright Chaos

    Definitely worth a read: Lessig is one of the more interesting legal minds out there.

    Reply »

    9:13 am 3/18/07
  5. thumbnail

    rwtaylor comments on:

    YouTube Takes Down Comedy Central Clips Based on DMCA Claims

    Viacom may not miss YouTube as much as some people think.


    The company recently began offering so-called embed code that allows fans of popular programs such as the South Park to post clips to their MySpace.com pages or blogs. That embed code duplicates one of the more popular features of YouTube: the ability to easily post videos on other Web sites and blogs.

    Reply »

    6:50 pm 3/12/07
  6. thumbnail

    rhoehn comments on:

    Fair Use Bill Introduced In Congress

    This is LONG overdue!

    Reply »

    11:12 pm 2/28/07
  7. thumbnail

    Kathy comments on:

    Fair Use Bill Introduced In Congress

    Ars Technica is skeptical. They provide background on prior versions of this bill and how those bills imploded when they hit the wall that is the recording industry.

    Even the press release from Broucher’s office says:

    “In an effort to address the concerns expressed by content owners, the FAIR USE Act does not contain provisions which would have established a fair use defense to the act of circumvention.

    The legislation instead contains specific exemptions to section 1201 of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act which do not pose a comparable potential threat to their business models.”

    Not holding my breath.

    Reply »

    11:03 am 2/28/07
  • Just Said
  • Top Posters
  •  

    There are no top posters for this section at this time.