Toxic

ah, thanks for clarity in response. Sounds very rational to me: whatever it takes. Sounds human, too. With such motivations, who is to say what is right or wrong?

God save us all….

Nice Damiann. I walked past Union Station in Toronto and a Greenpeace activist asked me for “a minute of my day?” What’s next? Two minutes? Damn activists…

I did notice that Canadian activists are nicer than those at home in the states who just stand in your way and try to start talking to you.

“The only thing better than one minute with an activist is two minutes with an activist baby.”

yeah…that’s right…Greenpeace just want publicity. They have no other intentions..,.like saving the environment . They JUST want publicity.

Cause publicity isn’t important for the environmental movement. There isn’t any media effort to downplay the problems….there aren’t any corporations with big bucks paying out the wazoo to keep it out of the public eye or public discussion.

NO! It’s GREENPEACE just trying to stroke it’s own collective ego.

Didn’t Greenpeace admit that they’re after publicity by going after Apple???
I’m not saying I enjoy toxic materials in my products or environment, just questioning motives.

Maybe the iPhone is so cool, it’s the “cigarette” of the oughts (‘00s)

“I know it’s bad for me, but I like to hold it in my hand”

or

“I know I should but I can’t quit”